Siler v. Bell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 14, 2004
• Docket: 03-7492
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7492

ANTHONY PAYNE SILER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. BELL; R. H. FUTRELL; R. WHITE; T. L. UNDERWOOD; SARGEANT JOHNSON; SARGEANT SMITH; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRETT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STALLINGS; R. STRICKLAND; HATTIE B. PIMPONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-534-5)

Submitted: June 23, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Payne Siler, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Anthony Payne Siler appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Siler v.

Bell, No. CA-02-534-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -