Sildar v. Board of Trustees of Huntington Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sildar v. Board of Trustees of Huntington Bay

89 A.D.2d 859, 453 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18022

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 2, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 859 (Sildar v. Board of Trustees of Huntington Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sildar v. Board of Trustees of Huntington Bay, 89 A.D.2d 859, 453 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay approving a grading plan and the issuance of a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), entered September 3, 1981, which granted the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, determination of the board of trustees confirmed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The determination of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay to approve the construction plans of the Mercantinis was supported by substantial evidence and was in full compliance with the 1970 restrictive covenant. The evidence established that the proposed construction would not create any new surface water drainage problems, and that the' height of the dwelling itself did not violate the applicable zoning standards. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay approving a grading plan and the issuance of a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), entered September 3, 1981, which granted the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, determination of the board of trustees confirmed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. The determination of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay to approve the construction plans of the Mercantinis was supported by substantial evidence and was in full compliance with the 1970 restrictive covenant. The evidence established that the proposed construction would not create any new surface water drainage problems, and that the' height of the dwelling itself did not violate the applicable zoning standards. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 859, 453 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sildar-v-board-of-trustees-of-huntington-bay-nyappdiv-1982.