Sildar v. Board of Trustees

New York Court of Appeals

Sildar v. Board of Trustees

443 N.E.2d 488, 57 N.Y.2d 934, 457 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3808

DecidedOctober 21, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 443 N.E.2d 488 (Sildar v. Board of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sildar v. Board of Trustees, 443 N.E.2d 488, 57 N.Y.2d 934, 457 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3808 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On the record before us it cannot be said that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay, acting in its capacity as the village planning [936]*936board, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, or abused its discretion under the restrictive covenant.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On the record before us it cannot be said that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay, acting in its capacity as the village planning [936]*936board, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, or abused its discretion under the restrictive covenant.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 N.E.2d 488, 57 N.Y.2d 934, 457 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sildar-v-board-of-trustees-ny-1982.