Silberstein v. State
This text of 111 So. 350 (Silberstein v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The information herein charging the obtaining of money from R. Rappaport by false pretense in a land sale transaction does not allege the ownership of the money, Webb v. State, 69 Fla. 697, 68 South. Rep. 943, and the information alleges that the defendant represented that the Green Silver Realty Company was the owner of the land, which company was not the owner of the land, while the instrument signed by R. Rappaport as purchaser, on which the prosecution is predicated, is signed for “Gertrude Estates Corporation” as the owner of the land.
Reversed.
Whiteield, P. J., and Terrell and Bueord, J. J., concur.
Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 So. 350, 93 Fla. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silberstein-v-state-fla-1927.