Silberstein v. PRO GOLF OF AMERICA, INC.
759 N.W.2d 882
This text of 759 N.W.2d 882 (Silberstein v. PRO GOLF OF AMERICA, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Silberstein v. PRO GOLF OF AMERICA, INC., 759 N.W.2d 882 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Ronald N. SILBERSTEIN, Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
PRO GOLF OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Pro Golf International, Inc., Pro-Golf.Com, Inc., and Ajay Sports, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and
Tom Itin, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are *883 not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
759 N.W.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silberstein-v-pro-golf-of-america-inc-mich-2009.