Silbernagel v. City of New York
440 N.E.2d 536, 57 N.Y.2d 691, 454 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3619
Opinion
OPINION of the court
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, order of Supreme Court, Bronx County, reinstated and question certified answered in the negative (Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer; Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer on constraint of Pierson v City of New York (56 NY2d 950). Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silbernagel v. City of New York, 440 N.E.2d 536, 57 N.Y.2d 691, 454 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3619 (N.Y. 1982).
440 N.E.2d 536 (Silbernagel v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JVC Tavern Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
123 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Thomas v. City of New York
102 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Hochberg v. City of New York
99 A.D.2d 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Marabello v. City of New York
99 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)