Silberman v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silberman v. Weaver

10 A.D.2d 634, 196 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 634 (Silberman v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silberman v. Weaver, 10 A.D.2d 634, 196 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator denying a protest to an order of a Local Rent Administrator which denied an application for decontrol, the appeal is from an order annulling the determination and directing the issuance of a decontrol order. The housing accommodation sought to be decontrolled is located on the third floor of a legal three-family dwelling which was formerly a two-family dwelling. Order reversed, with costs, and proceeding dismissed, without costs. The evidence fails to establish that the alteration and remodeling of the third floor resulted in additional housing accommodations as referred to in section 11 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations. (See Matter of Straker v. Weaver, 9 A D 2d 695; Matter of Phillips v. Weaver, 7 A D 2d 927; Matter of Goldner v. Abrams, 2 A D 2d 763.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator denying a protest to an order of a Local Rent Administrator which denied an application for decontrol, the appeal is from an order annulling the determination and directing the issuance of a decontrol order. The housing accommodation sought to be decontrolled is located on the third floor of a legal three-family dwelling which was formerly a two-family dwelling. Order reversed, with costs, and proceeding dismissed, without costs. The evidence fails to establish that the alteration and remodeling of the third floor resulted in additional housing accommodations as referred to in section 11 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations. (See Matter of Straker v. Weaver, 9 A D 2d 695; Matter of Phillips v. Weaver, 7 A D 2d 927; Matter of Goldner v. Abrams, 2 A D 2d 763.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 634, 196 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silberman-v-weaver-nyappdiv-1960.