Silberman v. Shulkin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOEL AARON SILBERMAN,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-1022 (JEB)
DAVID J. SHULKIN, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pro se Plaintiff Joel Silberman filed a Complaint on April 30, 2018, against several individuals and the Veterans Medical Center, claiming he was assaulted at the Center. See ECF No. 1. When Defendants moved to dismiss, noting Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, see ECF No. 20, the Court instructed Plaintiff that he had to respond by March 27, 2019, or the motion would be granted as conceded. See ECF No. 21. As Plaintiff has filed no opposition, the Court will treat Defendant’s Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.
/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge Date: April 2, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silberman v. Shulkin (Silberman v. Shulkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.