Silberman v. Scher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silberman v. Scher

168 A.D. 933

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Silberman v. Scher. Read the opinion of the Court — 154 A.D. 190 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

Final judgment modified by deducting therefrom $2,000 included therein as the value of the good will of the business, and also $1,399.58 unpaid balance on account of material furnished on plaintiff’s account from the wholesale store of Jacob Silberman, making a total reduction of $3,399.58; and as so modified it and the interlocutory judgment appealed from are severally affirmed, without costs to either party in this court. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Final judgment modified by deducting therefrom $2,000 included therein as the value of the good will of the business, and also $1,399.58 unpaid balance on account of material furnished on plaintiff’s account from the wholesale store of Jacob Silberman, making a total reduction of $3,399.58; and as so modified it and the interlocutory judgment appealed from are severally affirmed, without costs to either party in this court. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Silberman v. Scher, 168 A.D. 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

168 A.D. 933 (Silberman v. Scher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.