Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Silberman v. Clair

Silberman v. Clair

203 A.D.2d 276, 612 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 4, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 276 (Silberman v. Clair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silberman v. Clair, 203 A.D.2d 276, 612 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiff from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated February 28, 1992.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Roncallo at the Supreme Court in his memorandum decision dated February 3, 1992 (see, Danziger v Hearst Corp., 304 NY 244, 248; Scheinkman, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law § 235:1, at 121). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danziger v. Hearst Corp.
107 N.E.2d 62 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 276, 612 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silberman-v-clair-nyappdiv-1994.