Silber v. Plainview Orthopedics

New York Supreme Court

Silber v. Plainview Orthopedics

176 Misc. 2d 870, 674 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 213

DecidedMay 15, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Misc. 2d 870 (Silber v. Plainview Orthopedics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silber v. Plainview Orthopedics, 176 Misc. 2d 870, 674 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 213 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

This motion by defendants for an order precluding plaintiffs from presenting testimony from an expert in anatomy is denied.

Defendants seek to preclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert who is an M.D., holds a Ph D in anatomy and teaches in a medical school. Plaintiffs have refused to reveal his identity pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) as a “medical expert”. Defendants aver that because the expert is not currently licensed to practice medicine, and has never been licensed to practice medicine, his identity must be revealed.

[871]*871In the absence of any authority to support defendants’ claim, the court must enforce CPLR 3101 (d) as written, and the identity of a medical expert need not be revealed. Plaintiffs’ witness is a medical witness and the substance of the testimony he will give is of a medical nature. To require that he hold a license to practice medicine would be to add a requirement to the statute which does not appear therein. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

John S. Lockman, J.

This motion by defendants for an order precluding plaintiffs from presenting testimony from an expert in anatomy is denied.

Defendants seek to preclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert who is an M.D., holds a Ph D in anatomy and teaches in a medical school. Plaintiffs have refused to reveal his identity pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) as a “medical expert”. Defendants aver that because the expert is not currently licensed to practice medicine, and has never been licensed to practice medicine, his identity must be revealed.

[871]*871In the absence of any authority to support defendants’ claim, the court must enforce CPLR 3101 (d) as written, and the identity of a medical expert need not be revealed. Plaintiffs’ witness is a medical witness and the substance of the testimony he will give is of a medical nature. To require that he hold a license to practice medicine would be to add a requirement to the statute which does not appear therein. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 Misc. 2d 870, 674 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silber-v-plainview-orthopedics-nysupct-1998.