Silber de Wills v. Wills
668 So. 2d 1072, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1747, 1996 WL 82721
Opinions
Without necessarily endorsing the legal reasoning adopted by the trial court, see City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros, 376 So.2d 281, 284 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we conclude that it correctly determined that the parties were bound by an enforceable agreement resolving the pertinent issues of their marital dispute. See Taplin v. Taplin, 611 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Roskind v. Roskind, 552 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silber de Wills v. Wills, 668 So. 2d 1072, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1747, 1996 WL 82721 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
668 So. 2d 1072 (Silber de Wills v. Wills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roskind v. Roskind
552 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Silva v. Silva
467 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
City of Coral Gables v. Puiggros
376 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Taplin v. Taplin
611 So. 2d 561 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)