Silakoski v. Silakoski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Silakoski v. Silakoski

15 A.2d 751, 128 N.J. Eq. 180, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 640

DecidedOctober 10, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.2d 751 (Silakoski v. Silakoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silakoski v. Silakoski, 15 A.2d 751, 128 N.J. Eq. 180, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 640 (N.J. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The wife appeals from a decree dismissing her petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The facts as found by the learned advisory master, who heard the testimony and observed the witnesses, find an abundance of support in the record before us. His conclusions were filed February 2d, 1940.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Ciiiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The wife appeals from a decree dismissing her petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The facts as found by the learned advisory master, who heard the testimony and observed the witnesses, find an abundance of support in the record before us. His conclusions were filed February 2d, 1940.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Ciiiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.2d 751, 128 N.J. Eq. 180, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silakoski-v-silakoski-nj-1940.