Silakoski v. Silakoski

15 A.2d 751, 128 N.J. Eq. 180, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 640
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 10, 1940·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The wife appeals from a decree dismissing her petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The facts as found by the learned advisory master, who heard the testimony and observed the witnesses, find an abundance of support in the record before us. His conclusions were filed February 2d, 1940.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Ciiiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silakoski v. Silakoski, 15 A.2d 751, 128 N.J. Eq. 180, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 640 (N.J. 1940).

15 A.2d 751 (Silakoski v. Silakoski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.