Silak v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
181 A. 68, 115 N.J.L. 504, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 328
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Bafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silak v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 181 A. 68, 115 N.J.L. 504, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 1935).
181 A. 68 (Silak v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Francillo v. Latour
184 A. 820 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)