SIKMAN v. Toker

269 S.W.3d 46, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1490, 2008 WL 4901744

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Levent Sikman appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in his favor on his claims for unlawful forcible entry and detainer and return of security deposit asserted against Suheyla Toker. 1 We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

1 . Defendant Cenk Toroslu asserted a counterclaim against Sikman for personal injury. Sikman does not challenge that portion of the judgment that was entered upon the jury's finding in favor of Toroslu on his counterclaim.