Sikka v. Rumsfeld

Fourth Circuit

Sikka v. Rumsfeld

133 F. App'x 868

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2005·No. 05-1121·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mahesh C. Sikka appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Defendants on Sikka’s Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sikka v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-895-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mahesh C. Sikka appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Defendants on Sikka’s Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sikka v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-895-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sikka v. Rumsfeld, 133 F. App'x 868 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

133 F. App'x 868 (Sikka v. Rumsfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.