Sikes v. State

37 Ga. App. 164
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 20, 1927·No. 18282·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the ruling in Bennefield v. State, 80 Ga. 107 (2) (4 S. E. 869), where, in the State of Florida, a husband voluntarily and wilfully separated from his wife, whom he had married in the State of Georgia, and sent her and their child into the State of Georgia, and the child thereby became dependent and destitute in the latter State, he was guilty of abandoning his child, and the courts of Georgia had jurisdiction of the offense. See also Broten v. State, 122 Ga. 568 (2), 570 (50 S. E. 378). This ruling is not in conflict with the decision in Jemmerson v. State, 80 Ga. 111 (5 S. E. 131), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error. Under the above-stated ruling the charge of the court in the instant case was not error.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sikes v. State, 37 Ga. App. 164 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

37 Ga. App. 164 (Sikes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minnix v. State
290 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Fairbanks v. State
123 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Hunt v. State
91 S.E.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
People ex rel. Hartnett v. Ryan
185 Misc. 360 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Garrett v. State
153 S.E. 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Nunn v. State
148 S.E. 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)