Sikes v. Hurt
89 S.E. 832, 145 Ga. 790, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 478
Opinion
1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the writ of error.
2. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer and objections to the amendment to the plaintiff’s petition, in revoking the order allowing the amendment, and in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit!
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sikes v. Hurt, 89 S.E. 832, 145 Ga. 790, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 478 (Ga. 1916).
89 S.E. 832 (Sikes v. Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mooney v. Mooney
37 S.E.2d 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Georgian Co. v. Kinney
92 S.E. 31 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)