Sikes v. Hurt

89 S.E. 832, 145 Ga. 790, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 478
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 12, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 832 (Sikes v. Hurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sikes v. Hurt, 89 S.E. 832, 145 Ga. 790, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 478 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the writ of error.

2. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer and objections to the amendment to the plaintiff’s petition, in revoking the order allowing the amendment, and in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit!

Judgment affirmed.

By -jive Justices, all' concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mooney v. Mooney
37 S.E.2d 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Georgian Co. v. Kinney
92 S.E. 31 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 832, 145 Ga. 790, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sikes-v-hurt-ga-1916.