Sikes v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sikes v. Brown

58 S.E. 502, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 355

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1907·No. 451·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial' in which error is as» signed upon the admission of evidence will not be considered by this court, when the evidence objected to is not set forth, literally or in substance, nor attached to the motion as an exhibit. Hicks v. Webb, 127 Ga. 171 (5), 56 S. E. 307; Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), 56 S. E. 998, and cit.; Waldrop v. Wolff, 114 Ga. 610 (2), 40 S. E. 830.

2. The verdict is well warranted ,by the evidence; and no reversible error appears. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial' in which error is as» signed upon the admission of evidence will not be considered by this court, when the evidence objected to is not set forth, literally or in substance, nor attached to the motion as an exhibit. Hicks v. Webb, 127 Ga. 171 (5), 56 S. E. 307; Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), 56 S. E. 998, and cit.; Waldrop v. Wolff, 114 Ga. 610 (2), 40 S. E. 830.

2. The verdict is well warranted ,by the evidence; and no reversible error appears. Judgment affirmed.

Sikes v. Brown, 58 S.E. 502, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 355 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

58 S.E. 502 (Sikes v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related