Sikes v. Brown

58 S.E. 502, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 355
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1907
Docket451
StatusPublished

This text of 58 S.E. 502 (Sikes v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sikes v. Brown, 58 S.E. 502, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 355 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial' in which error is as» signed upon the admission of evidence will not be considered by this court, when the evidence objected to is not set forth, literally or in substance, nor attached to the motion as an exhibit. Hicks v. Webb, 127 Ga. 171 (5), 56 S. E. 307; Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), 56 S. E. 998, and cit.; Waldrop v. Wolff, 114 Ga. 610 (2), 40 S. E. 830.

2. The verdict is well warranted ,by the evidence; and no reversible error appears. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waldrop v. Wolff
40 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Hicks v. Webb
56 S.E. 307 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Lewis, Robinson & Co. v. Hutchinson
56 S.E. 998 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E. 502, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sikes-v-brown-gactapp-1907.