Siguencia v. State
613 So. 2d 116, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1993 WL 17728
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1993·No. No. 90-01301·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s community control but remand for correction of the written order to reflect the court’s oral pronouncement as to the community control conditions violated. The defendant need not be present for this purpose. See Boggs v. State, 557 So.2d 203 (Fla. 2d DCA1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Siguencia v. State, 613 So. 2d 116, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 644, 1993 WL 17728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
613 So. 2d 116 (Siguencia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
686 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)