Sigony v. Richards
1 Root 119
Opinion
The note is expressly joint and several. The plaintiff has declared upon it truly, as it is expressed to bo on the face of it; there is therefore no variance.
Whether Buel had authority to bind Richards his co-partner, severally or not, may depend upon circumstances, which might he disclosed in an. action, brought against him severally; but this is a joint action brought against both, in which that question doth not arise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sigony v. Richards, 1 Root 119 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).
1 Root 119 (Sigony v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phelps v. Riley
3 Conn. 266 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1820)