Signoriello v. Moore
This text of 242 A.D. 639 (Signoriello v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. There was here, as a matter of law, a violation of the zoning ordinance. The Special Term may find it equitable to award plaintiff money damages as an alternative to an injunction. In the light of the record and our common understanding, we are constrained to say that we are not in accord with the view of the learned Special Term that the damage suffered by plaintiff is “ more sentimental than real.” Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs for reversal but votes to grant a permanent injunction. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/signoriello-v-moore-nyappdiv-1934.