Signer v. Odell
This text of 176 So. 2d 94 (Signer v. Odell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Initial inspection suggested that the decision under review, Odell et al. v. Signer et al., 169 So.2d 851, was prima facie in •conflict with prior decisions of this Court and another District Court. We granted •certiorari to hear arguments on both juris- • diction and merits
After oral arguments and a careful further study of the record and briefs we have •decided that no jurisdictional conflict of •decisions is present. We therefore conclude 'that the writ was improvidently issued and :it must be discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 2d 94, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/signer-v-odell-fla-1965.