Signer v. Odell

176 So. 2d 94, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3187
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1965
DocketNo. 34008
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 176 So. 2d 94 (Signer v. Odell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Signer v. Odell, 176 So. 2d 94, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3187 (Fla. 1965).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Initial inspection suggested that the decision under review, Odell et al. v. Signer et al., 169 So.2d 851, was prima facie in •conflict with prior decisions of this Court and another District Court. We granted •certiorari to hear arguments on both juris- • diction and merits

After oral arguments and a careful further study of the record and briefs we have •decided that no jurisdictional conflict of •decisions is present. We therefore conclude 'that the writ was improvidently issued and :it must be discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. North American Title Co.
876 P.2d 1291 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Rollins Nursing Home, Inc. v. M & LC/Stillwell Mortgage Co.
593 S.W.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)
Frank C. Uible v. Beverly W. Landstreet, III
392 F.2d 467 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
Boulevard Nat. Bank of Miami v. Air Metals Indus., Inc.
176 So. 2d 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 94, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/signer-v-odell-fla-1965.