Sigmund v. Progressive Northern Insurance

D.C. Circuit

Sigmund v. Progressive Northern Insurance

179 F. App'x 61

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 2006

DocketNo. 05-7081

StatusPublished

This text of 179 F. App'x 61 (Sigmund v. Progressive Northern Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sigmund v. Progressive Northern Insurance, 179 F. App'x 61 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reason stated in Part II.C of the opinion of the district court. See Sigmund v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 374 F.Supp.2d 33, 41-42 (D.D.C.2005).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI