Sigmund Pollack v. City of Newark, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and Others Unknown to at This Time

248 F.2d 543
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 22, 1957·No. 12207·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff has appealed from orders of the District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment for the defendants in the plaintiff’s suit against them for alleged deprivation of his civil rights. The plaintiff’s contentions were fully discussed and correctly disposed of in an able opinion filed in the district court by Judge Modarelli to which we need add nothing.

The orders of the district court will be affirmed. 147 F.Supp. 35.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sigmund Pollack v. City of Newark, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and Others Unknown to at This Time, 248 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1957).

248 F.2d 543 (Sigmund Pollack v. City of Newark, N.J., Frederick R. Lacey, John Owens, and Others Unknown to at This Time) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seifert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
515 F. Supp. 2d 601 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
Skevofilax v. Quigley
586 F. Supp. 532 (D. New Jersey, 1984)
Farrell v. Theriault
464 A.2d 188 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)