Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company
This text of 323 F.2d 364 (Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
323 F.2d 364
Sigmund J. COSENTINE, Appellant,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 14388.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 11, 1963.
Decided Oct. 23, 1963.
Matthew J. Ryan, III, Philadelphia, Pa. (Cornelius C. O'Brien, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, STALEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court entered pursuant to the jury's verdict will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 F.2d 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sigmund-j-cosentine-v-the-pennsylvania-railroad-co-ca3-1963.