Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Third Circuit

Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company

323 F.2d 364

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 23, 1963·No. 14388·Published

Opinion

323 F.2d 364

Sigmund J. COSENTINE, Appellant,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 14388.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 11, 1963.
Decided Oct. 23, 1963.

Matthew J. Ryan, III, Philadelphia, Pa. (Cornelius C. O'Brien, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court entered pursuant to the jury's verdict will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

323 F.2d 364

Sigmund J. COSENTINE, Appellant,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 14388.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 11, 1963.
Decided Oct. 23, 1963.

Matthew J. Ryan, III, Philadelphia, Pa. (Cornelius C. O'Brien, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court entered pursuant to the jury's verdict will be affirmed.

Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 323 F.2d 364 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

323 F.2d 364 (Sigmund J. Cosentine v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.