Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sigmond v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium

Sigmond v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium

99 A.D.3d 554, 951 N.Y.S.2d 873
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 554 (Sigmond v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sigmond v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium, 99 A.D.3d 554, 951 N.Y.S.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The court properly quashed the subpoenas served by respondent on nonparty Bright Horizons because the parties did not stipulate to conduct discovery of Bright Horizons (see CPLR 3102 [b], [c]; compare Textron, Inc. v Unisys Corp., 138 Misc 2d 124, 126 [Sup Ct, NY County 1987]; Matter of ACE Am. Ins. Co., 6 Misc 3d 1005[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51732[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2004]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Textron, Inc. v. Unisys Corp.
138 Misc. 2d 124 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 554, 951 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sigmond-v-board-of-managers-of-parc-vendome-condominium-nyappdiv-2012.