Siglin v. Armour & Co.

103 A. 991, 261 Pa. 30, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 682
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 18, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 12
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 103 A. 991 (Siglin v. Armour & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siglin v. Armour & Co., 103 A. 991, 261 Pa. 30, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 682 (Pa. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

When the husband and father of the appellees was jolted from the truck of the. appellant, he was in the course of his employment with it. How he happened to be sitting where he was at the time he was jolted from the truck is utterly immaterial, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below sustaining the action of the referee and the compensation board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Husky Terminal Restr., Inc.
762 P.2d 1193 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1988)
Ginther v. J. P. Graham Transfer Co.
27 A.2d 712 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Delbene v. Pine
19 A.2d 533 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Boyd v. Philmont Country Club
195 A. 156 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Menendes v. Dravo Construction Co.
167 A. 423 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Granville v. Scranton Coal Co.
76 Pa. Super. 335 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Blouss v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.
73 Pa. Super. 95 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 991, 261 Pa. 30, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siglin-v-armour-co-pa-1918.