Siginesky v. Kinney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Siginesky v. Kinney

4 Walk. 299

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 5, 1884·No. No. 233·Published

Opinion

The Supreme Court quashed the writ of error on May 5th, 1884, in the following opinion :

Per Curiam.

An appeal having been taken and a recognizance entered into within the time fixed by the statute, it was not error for the Court to permit the appeal to be afterwards perfected. The affidavit having been made, and a recognizance taken in due form, there was no error in refusing to strike off the appeal. As the case is now pending error will not lie.

Writ quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court quashed the writ of error on May 5th, 1884, in the following opinion :

Per Curiam.

An appeal having been taken and a recognizance entered into within the time fixed by the statute, it was not error for the Court to permit the appeal to be afterwards perfected. The affidavit having been made, and a recognizance taken in due form, there was no error in refusing to strike off the appeal. As the case is now pending error will not lie.

Writ quashed.

Siginesky v. Kinney, 4 Walk. 299 (Pa. 1884).

Pincite

4 Walk. 299 (Siginesky v. Kinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.