Sigel v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 68 (Sigel v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate an order holding to bail on a writ of capias in an action in tort against relator, a physician, who is charged with so recklessly, negligently and unnecessarily performing an operation as to cause the premature delivery of a child.
Granted October 21, 1896, with costs.
Kelator contended that the affidavit failed to show that the treatment given constituted malpractice; that the only evidence admissible to prove malpractice is the testimony of physicians, citing Sheridan vs. Briggs, 53 M., 569; Wood vs. Baker, 49 M., 295; Spaulding vs. Bliss, 83 M., 311; Moyle vs. Circuit Judge, 97 M., 136 (No. 68); Howell vs. Circuit Judge, 88 M., 366 (112); Stensrud vs. Delamater, 56 M., 145; McCrea vs. Circuit Judge, 100 M., 355 (114).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sigel-v-circuit-judge-mich-1896.