Sigan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sigan v. State

1911 OK CR 409, 117 P. 650, 6 Okla. Crim. 632, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 5, 1911

DocketNo. A-1123.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 409 (Sigan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sigan v. State, 1911 OK CR 409, 117 P. 650, 6 Okla. Crim. 632, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 3rd day of March, 1911, judgment was rendered in the county court of Tulsa county against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve 90 days in the county jail. Appellant was granted by the court 30 days time within which to prepare and serve a case-made. The record shows that the case-made was not served on the county attorney until the 3rd day of April, 1911, which was the 31st day after the rendition of the judgment. The case-made must therefore be stricken from the record. The ease-made is not certified in such a manner as would constitute it a transcript of the record. We therefore cannot consider anything presented in said case-made, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 3rd day of March, 1911, judgment was rendered in the county court of Tulsa county against appellant for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve 90 days in the county jail. Appellant was granted by the court 30 days time within which to prepare and serve a case-made. The record shows that the case-made was not served on the county attorney until the 3rd day of April, 1911, which was the 31st day after the rendition of the judgment. The case-made must therefore be stricken from the record. The ease-made is not certified in such a manner as would constitute it a transcript of the record. We therefore cannot consider anything presented in said case-made, and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 409, 117 P. 650, 6 Okla. Crim. 632, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sigan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.