Sifuentes v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC

• Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
• Decided: February 23, 2024
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00127
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

LORI SIFUENTES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:24cv127-MHT ) (WO) PILOT TRAVEL CENTERS LLC, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER The allegations of the notice of removal are insufficient to invoke this court's removal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity of citizenship) and § 1441 (removal). To invoke removal jurisdiction based on diversity, the notice of removal must “distinctly and affirmatively allege[]” each party's citizenship. McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc., 511 F. 2d 653, 654 (5th Cir. 1975) (per curiam) (citations omitted).* The allegations must show that

* In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all of the citizenship of each plaintiff is different from that of each defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

The notice of removal fails to meet this standard. The notice pleads the “residence” rather than the “citizenship” of plaintiff Lori Sifuentes. An allegation that a party is a “resident” of a State is

not sufficient to establish that a party is a “citizen” of that State. Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225, 233 (5th Cir. 1971). ***

It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the removing party has until March 8, 2024, to amend the notice of removal to allege

jurisdiction sufficiently, 28 U.S.C. § 1653; otherwise, this lawsuit shall be remanded to state court. DONE, this the 23rd day of February, 2024.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981.