Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc
Opinion
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE
9 10 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III, CASE NO. C21-5613JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 NAUTILUS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14
15 Before the court is Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes, III’s motion for default 16 judgment against Defendant Nautilus, Inc. (Mot. (Dkt. # 15).) The court has reviewed 17 Mr. Sifuentes’s motion, the balance of the record, and the applicable law. Being fully 18 advised, the court DENIES Mr. Sifuentes’s motion. 19 The Local Civil Rules provide specific requirements for a party seeking default 20 judgment, and Mr. Sifuentes has not satisfied those requirements. See Local Rules W.D. 21 Wash. LCR 55. Local Rule 55(b)(1) states: “No motion for judgment by default should 22 be filed against any party unless the court has previously granted a motion for default 1 against that party pursuant to LCR 55(a) or unless default otherwise has been entered.” 2 Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 55(b)(1). Thus, before it may consider a motion for
3 default judgment, the court must have previously granted a motion for default. See id. 4 Further, as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated, Federal Rule of Civil 5 Procedure 55 also requires a “two-step process” consisting of: (1) seeking a clerk’s entry 6 of default, and (2) filing a motion for the entry of default judgment. See Eitel v. McCool, 7 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986) (“Eitel apparently fails to understand the two-step 8 process required by Rule 55.”); see also Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d
9 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that Rules 55(a) and (b) provide a two-step process for 10 obtaining a default judgment); Norman v. Small, No. 09cv2235 WQH, 2010 WL 11 5173683, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2010) (denying the plaintiff’s motion for default 12 judgment because the clerk had not yet entered a default). 13 Accordingly, the court DENIES Mr. Sifuentes’s motion for default judgment (Dkt.
14 # 15) without prejudice to seeking default judgment in accordance with the Local Civil 15 Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 16 Dated this 29th day of November, 2021. 17 A 18 19 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 20 21 22
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc (Sifuentes v. Nautilus Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.