Sifuentes v. Department of Child Support Services Kings County

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 16, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-00624·Unknown

Opinion

VICTOR ALVARADO SIFUENTES, Case No. 1:23-cv-00624-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT DEFENDANT PARKER STANDBURY LLP SERVICES KINGS COUNTY, et al., (ECF No. 36). Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), as to Defendant Parker Standbury LLP. (ECF No. 36). As Defendant Parker Standbury LLP has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and in light of the voluntary dismissal, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Stanbury LLP are terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and have been dismissed with prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate as pending all hearings and deadlines related to Defendant Parker Stansbury’s motion to quash summons (ECF No. 32). ; IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ June 16, 2023 □□□ hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sifuentes v. Department of Child Support Services Kings County, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Sifuentes v. Department of Child Support Services Kings County (Sifuentes v. Department of Child Support Services Kings County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)