Sifuentes-Garcia v. Gonzales

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2006
Docket05-60680
StatusUnpublished

This text of Sifuentes-Garcia v. Gonzales (Sifuentes-Garcia v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sifuentes-Garcia v. Gonzales, (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-60680 Summary Calendar

JUAN MARIO SIFUENTES-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A75-214-007 --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Mario Sifuentes-Garcia (Sifuentes) appeals the

affirmance by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of a motion for continuance of

the removal proceeding. Sifuentes contends that he should have

been granted the continuance so that he could challenge the 2003

alien-smuggling conviction that rendered him removable.

This court reviews the denial of a continuance for abuse of

discretion. Witter v. INS, 113 F.3d 549, 555-56 (5th Cir. 1997).

An IJ may grant a continuance upon a showing of good cause. Id.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-60680 -2-

Sifuentes cites to two BIA decisions having nothing to do

with the granting of a continuance, and he makes no argument

directly relevant to the “good cause” that must be shown in order

to obtain a continuance.

Sifuentes fails to show that the denial of a continuance was

an abuse of discretion. His petition for review is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Witter v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
113 F.3d 549 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sifuentes-Garcia v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sifuentes-garcia-v-gonzales-ca5-2006.