Sierra v. State
This text of 566 So. 2d 947 (Sierra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the state’s confession of error which we accept, the judgments of conviction under review for (1) burglary of an occupied structure with an assault therein, and (2) robbery are modified so as to strike the finding of “with a mask” therefrom; in all other respects, however, the judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed. See, e.g., Cox v. State, 530 So.2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Senterfitt v. State, 515 So.2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 523 So.2d 578 (Fla.1988); Cochenet v. State, 445 So.2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984).
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
566 So. 2d 947, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7285, 1990 WL 138418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sierra-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.