Sierra v. Cohn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sierra v. Cohn

144 N.Y.S. 454

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 454 (Sierra v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sierra v. Cohn, 144 N.Y.S. 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The record in this case is not in a satisfactory con-_ dition, and it is impossible to determine from it exactly what relief either party is entitled to. The plaintiff has recovered judgment for $55.82, and claims that the judgment in her favor should be increased to $70.37. The defendants, on the other hand, claim that judgment should have been rendered in their favor. The only point upon which the parties agree is that the judgment rendered is not correct. Under these circumstances, and in view of the condition of the record, we think the interests of justice will be best served by ordering a new trial. As the case must be retried, we refrain from any expression of opinion as to the contentions of either party.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, without costs to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The record in this case is not in a satisfactory con-_ dition, and it is impossible to determine from it exactly what relief either party is entitled to. The plaintiff has recovered judgment for $55.82, and claims that the judgment in her favor should be increased to $70.37. The defendants, on the other hand, claim that judgment should have been rendered in their favor. The only point upon which the parties agree is that the judgment rendered is not correct. Under these circumstances, and in view of the condition of the record, we think the interests of justice will be best served by ordering a new trial. As the case must be retried, we refrain from any expression of opinion as to the contentions of either party.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, without costs to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 N.Y.S. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sierra-v-cohn-nyappterm-1913.