Sierichs v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

27 Misc. 806

This text of 27 Misc. 806 (Sierichs v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sierichs v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 27 Misc. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing affirmatively by the record that the defendant is a foreign corporation, we- are constrained, under the recent decision of this court in the case of Rieser v. Parker & Co., 27 Misc. Rep. 205, to reverse the judgment for the reason that no jurisdiction was vested in the Municipal Court.

Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellant.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rieser v. Charles F. Parker & Co.
27 Misc. 205 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Misc. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sierichs-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-nyappterm-1899.