SIERAK, BERNADETTE v. STARING, KYLE
This text of SIERAK, BERNADETTE v. STARING, KYLE (SIERAK, BERNADETTE v. STARING, KYLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1434 CAF 13-02220 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF BERNADETTE SIERAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KYLE STARING, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
MARK A. WOLBER, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
KOSLOSKY & KOSLOSKY, UTICA (WILLIAM L. KOSLOSKY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered September 6, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, ordered Kyle Staring to pay attorney’s fees in the sum of $3,200.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Sierak v Staring ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Jan. 2, 2015]).
Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SIERAK, BERNADETTE v. STARING, KYLE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sierak-bernadette-v-staring-kyle-nyappdiv-2015.