Sien v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
111 S.W.2d 1231
Opinion
* Affirmed without written opinion (Associated Indemnity Corporation et al. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294) upon the authority of 38 Tex.Jur. p. 273, § 107; Kirbs v. Provine, 78 Tex. 353, 14 S.W. 849: Ullmann, etc., v. Rogers, Tex.Civ.App., 288 S.W. 1109; Hume v. S. Netter, A. Geismar & Co., Tex.Civ.App., writ refused, 72 S.W. 865; Wilson v. Manning, Tex.Civ.App., 35 S.W. 1079.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sien v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 111 S.W.2d 1231 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).
111 S.W.2d 1231 (Sien v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling
75 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Ullmann, Stern & Krausse, Inc. v. Rogers
288 S.W. 1109 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Spies v. Provine
14 S.W. 849 (Texas Supreme Court, 1890)