SIEMUCHA, PAUL v. GARRISON, ROBERT D.
This text of SIEMUCHA, PAUL v. GARRISON, ROBERT D. (SIEMUCHA, PAUL v. GARRISON, ROBERT D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1146 CA 12-01544 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
PAUL SIEMUCHA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
ROBERT D. GARRISON AND CLARNELL HENDERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, BUFFALO (JOSHUA P. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered June 6, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendants to set aside a jury verdict.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SIEMUCHA, PAUL v. GARRISON, ROBERT D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siemucha-paul-v-garrison-robert-d-nyappdiv-2013.