Siemon v. Law School Admission Council, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siemon v. Law School Admission Council, Inc.

292 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 515 (Siemon v. Law School Admission Council, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siemon v. Law School Admission Council, Inc., 292 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter aha, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County [516]*516(Colabella, J.), entered March 21, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment by coming forward with evidence demonstrating that it acted in good faith and in full compliance with its rules and procedures, to which the plaintiff consented to be bound. In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Matter of Yaeger v Educational Testing Serv., 158 AD2d 602). Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter aha, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County [516]*516(Colabella, J.), entered March 21, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment by coming forward with evidence demonstrating that it acted in good faith and in full compliance with its rules and procedures, to which the plaintiff consented to be bound. In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Matter of Yaeger v Educational Testing Serv., 158 AD2d 602). Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 282, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siemon-v-law-school-admission-council-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack