Siemientkoskie v. Graboskie Et Ux.

188 A. 537, 324 Pa. 516, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 1, 1936
DocketAppeal, 382
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 188 A. 537 (Siemientkoskie v. Graboskie Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siemientkoskie v. Graboskie Et Ux., 188 A. 537, 324 Pa. 516, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 552 (Pa. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from a decree directing a conveyance of real estate to appellee, the person who had paid the purchase price, the deed having been made to appellants. The court below found as a fact that at the time the con *517 sideration was paid and the property conveyed to appellants, the appellee “did not comprehend the nature of his act nor did he understand the transaction.” This finding, supported by evidence, will not he interfered with by this Court.

We have examined the other assignments of error and they are without merit. Indeed the equities of the case are all with the appellee.

Decree affirmed at cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stack v. Wapner
368 A.2d 292 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Waddell v. Carson
97 S.E.2d 222 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A. 537, 324 Pa. 516, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siemientkoskie-v-graboskie-et-ux-pa-1936.