SIEMENS INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS v. Collins
This text of 854 So. 2d 271 (SIEMENS INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIEMENS INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK and Travelers Property Casualty, Appellants,
v.
Guy COLLINS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Eric R. Eide and Earl I. Higgs, Jr. of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, *272 Eide & Telan, P. A., Orlando, for Appellants.
Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The employer/carrier in this workers' compensation case appeal a final order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC) awarding the claimant medical and indemnity benefits. They argue that the JCC erred by denying their motion for the appointment of orthopaedic and psychiatric expert medical advisors as untimely. Our review of the record reveals that the employer/carrier timely requested the appointment of expert medical advisors once the disagreements in the opinions of the healthcare providers in this case became apparent and did not delay the discovery of these disagreements. See Palm Springs General Hospital v. Cabrera, 698 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); see also Helmsman Management Services v. Garner, 725 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and this case is remanded.
BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
854 So. 2d 271, 2003 WL 22103485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siemens-information-communications-v-collins-fladistctapp-2003.