Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.

241 A.D. 679

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment modified by providing that the dismissal of the complaint is without prejudice to another action under the provisions of section 23 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by providing that the dismissal of the complaint is without prejudice to another action under the provisions of section 23 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury.

Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co., 241 A.D. 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 679 (Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.