Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.

241 A.D. 679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 679 (Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sieh v. Spring Valley Coach Co., 241 A.D. 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by providing that the dismissal of the complaint is without prejudice to another action under the provisions of section 23 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by providing that the dismissal of the complaint is without prejudice to another action under the provisions of section 23 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sieh-v-spring-valley-coach-co-nyappdiv-1934.