Siegmund v. Dailey Thomas Holding, LLC
Opinion
ORDER
Bernard Allen Siegmund and Mary Margaret Siegmund appeal the judgment of the Buchanan County Circuit Court denying their claims for adverse possession and prescriptive easement. In their first two points on appeal, they argue that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. In their third point on appeal, they argue that the trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of a witness.
Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
523 S.W.3d 544 (Siegmund v. Dailey Thomas Holding, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.