Siegmund v. Dailey Thomas Holding, LLC

523 S.W.3d 544, 2017 WL 2644082, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 616
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 20, 2017
DocketWD 79790
StatusPublished

This text of 523 S.W.3d 544 (Siegmund v. Dailey Thomas Holding, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegmund v. Dailey Thomas Holding, LLC, 523 S.W.3d 544, 2017 WL 2644082, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 616 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Allen Siegmund and Mary Margaret Siegmund appeal the judgment of the Buchanan County Circuit Court denying their claims for adverse possession and prescriptive easement. In their first two points on appeal, they argue that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. In their third point on appeal, they argue that the trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of a witness.

Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 S.W.3d 544, 2017 WL 2644082, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegmund-v-dailey-thomas-holding-llc-moctapp-2017.