Siegman v. Day

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Siegman v. Day

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 374, 20 Dickinson 374, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 288

DecidedMarch 11, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A. 1125 (Siegman v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siegman v. Day, 54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 374, 20 Dickinson 374, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 288 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts set out in the bill of complaint in this cause are, in their legal effect, identical with those exhibited in the bill in the ease of Siegman v. Maloney, decided at the present term of this court. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, the decree brought up ,by this appeal should be affirmed. '

[375]*375For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The facts set out in the bill of complaint in this cause are, in their legal effect, identical with those exhibited in the bill in the ease of Siegman v. Maloney, decided at the present term of this court. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, the decree brought up ,by this appeal should be affirmed. '

[375]*375For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 10.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 374, 20 Dickinson 374, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegman-v-day-nj-1903.