Siegle v. State

625 So. 2d 955, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682, 1993 WL 424217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1993·No. No. 92-03223·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for sale and possession of a hallucinogenic substance. However, we find that the trial court erred in imposing adult sanctions without first making the findings required by section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). This is so even though appellant’s sentence, two years’ Youthful Offender community control, was the result of a plea agreement. Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 623 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). After remand the trial court may reimpose the adult sanction provided the statutory findings are made.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siegle v. State, 625 So. 2d 955, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682, 1993 WL 424217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 955 (Siegle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. State
625 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)