Siegle v. State

625 So. 2d 955, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682, 1993 WL 424217
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 1993
DocketNo. 92-03223
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 955 (Siegle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siegle v. State, 625 So. 2d 955, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682, 1993 WL 424217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for sale and possession of a hallucinogenic substance. However, we find that the trial court erred in imposing adult sanctions without first making the findings required by section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). This is so even though appellant’s sentence, two years’ Youthful Offender community control, was the result of a plea agreement. Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 623 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). After remand the trial court may reimpose the adult sanction provided the statutory findings are made.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. State
625 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 955, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682, 1993 WL 424217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegle-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.