Siegel v. Swarts
187 U.S. 638, 23 S. Ct. 846, 47 L. Ed. 344, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 772
This text of 187 U.S. 638 (Siegel v. Swarts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Siegel v. Swarts, 187 U.S. 638, 23 S. Ct. 846, 47 L. Ed. 344, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 772 (1902).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Bogy v. Daugherty, 184 U. S. 696; Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Keystone Manganese and Iron Company v. Martin, 132 U. S. 91.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. Martin
132 U.S. 91 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 U.S. 638, 23 S. Ct. 846, 47 L. Ed. 344, 1902 U.S. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-swarts-scotus-1902.