Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co.
250 F. 1022, 162 C.C.A. 665, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023
Opinion
At the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for defendant. This was right, first, because the record failed to' establish or warrant an inference of negligence of defendant, and, second, because the alleged negligence is not shown to be the'proximate cause of the injury. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co., 250 F. 1022, 162 C.C.A. 665, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023 (7th Cir. 1918).
250 F. 1022 (Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.