Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co.
250 F. 1022, 162 C.C.A. 665, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023
This text of 250 F. 1022 (Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Siegel v. Southern Pac. Co., 250 F. 1022, 162 C.C.A. 665, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023 (7th Cir. 1918).
Opinion
At the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for defendant. This was right, first, because the record failed to' establish or warrant an inference of negligence of defendant, and, second, because the alleged negligence is not shown to be the'proximate cause of the injury. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
250 F. 1022, 162 C.C.A. 665, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 2023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siegel-v-southern-pac-co-ca7-1918.